Enemies Are Exploiting Unregulated Data Broker Location Data To Target And Kill U.S. Troops
from the corruption-kills dept
There are two major reasons that the U.S. doesn’t pass an internet-era privacy law or regulate data brokers despite a parade of dangerous scandals. One, lobbied by a vast web of interconnected industries with unlimited budgets, Congress is too corrupt to do its job. Two, the U.S. government is disincentivized to do anything because it exploits this privacy dysfunction to dodge domestic surveillance warrants.
If we imposed safeguards on consumer data, everybody from app makers to telecoms would make billions less per quarter. So our corrupt lawmakers pretend the vast human harms of our greed are a distant and unavoidable externality (unless the privacy issues involve some kid tracking rich people on their planes, of course, in which case Congress moves with a haste that would break the sound barrier).
I’ve warned about this for the last decade here at Techdirt, and the check is coming due. The Pentagon is steadily coming to realize that enemies are using location data purchased from unregulated data brokers to target and kill U.S. troops overseas:
“In a letter shared with Reuters by U.S. Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, U.S. Central Command said it had “received multiple threat reports concerning adversary exploitation of commercial location data to target or surveil U.S. personnel in theater.”
Poor Ron Wyden. The guy has been warning about this outcome for longer than Techdirt, and his reward is generally an apathetic congressional body too corrupted by greed to function.
This should surprise absolutely nobody.
Two years ago, Wired released an excellent report documenting how it was relatively trivial to buy the sensitive and detailed movement data of U.S. military and intelligence workers as they moved around Germany. And for much of the past decade cellular providers had been found to be collecting user movement data, selling it, and either not telling consumers or outright lying about it.
If foreign governments can’t get your sensitive location data from a litany of apps that track your every movement, they can get it from data brokers or the wireless carriers themselves.
When the FCC tried to fine wireless carriers like AT&T for spying on and monetizing consumer movements, the fines were vacated by Trump’s Fifth Circuit appeals court. Wyden had previously revealed how right wing extremists were able to easily purchase the location data of abortion clinic visitors and then target them with dangerous health care disinformation. The congressional response: bupkis.
It’s not subtle: the U.S. is too corrupt to function. Instead of fixing that problem, Republicans, “free market” Libertarians, and many centrist Democrats spend most of their time figuring out new ways to lobotomize our regulators, pre-empt meaningful privacy legislation, and completely defang what’s left of corporate oversight. You know, because we just love free market innovation so much.
In his latest letter to the Pentagon, Wyden once again makes the case that the ad tech industry, as currently formulated, poses a direct national security threat:
“Commercial location data can be used to identify where U.S. troops congregate and their pattern of life, which can be exploited by adversaries to target attacks such as missiles, drones, and roadside bombs, as well as for counterintelligence purposes,” the letter warned. Wyden said in a statement that it was time to “start treating the adtech industry as a national security threat.”
Of course, it’s not just the ad industry that poses a national security threat, it’s corruption. It’s the mindless deregulation of industry by bad faith actors. It’s lax government privacy and security oversight of private companies (and their executives). It’s regulatory capture at the hands of corrupt, weird zealots. And it’s a government obsessed with hyper-scaled domestic surveillance with no meaningful guardrails.
Filed Under: data brokers, defense, deregulation, dod, location data, national security, pentagon, privacy, ron wyden, security, troops


Comments on “Enemies Are Exploiting Unregulated Data Broker Location Data To Target And Kill U.S. Troops”
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Stop trying to kill business, you communist satanist.
Re:
Have businesses stop killing people, you godless corporatist.
Re:
If a business can be destroyed only by the government regulating how said business can gather and distribute data on people, that business not only deserves to be destroyed, its destruction is both morally righteous and ethically sound.
Dont count
Using a device that WANTS to know Where you are and will TRY to triangulate, 3-4 ways to Find you. Even if it Finds the Local Broadcast tower, and it Goes Boom,
Your cellphone has a very good range in the USA, so consider your Signal Probably reaches 20 miles to find a tower, and that Signal is Very easy to TRACK, unless your Phone is OFF/TOTALLY and not running ANYTHING that would keep it Active.
Re:
Your phone is often waiting for a Bluetooth signal to turn itself on and is only asleep when “off” now.
Beam forming antenna that track your phone around with an em beam is also widespread.
Re: Re: ??
bt IS USED FOR OTHER THINGS cLOSE RANGE.
Wifi, and the Call system are medium to long range.
Or would you like a Tech Quiz?
And radio signals Are very interesting, if you consider Ranges..
It’s not really unregulated. There are all kinds of laws. There is insufficient will to bring espionage charges.
Re:
Name five laws that regulate data broker location data.
Re: Re: I can think of a few
Re: Re:
As stated above the espionage act could be used if the broker had reason to believe the information would be used against the United States.
Federal regulation relies on a patchwork of sector-specific privacy laws and targeted national security restrictions.
Protecting Americans’ Data from Foreign Adversaries Act (PADFAA)
Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)
Federal Trade Commission (FTCA)
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)
Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
National Security Actions & Executive Rules
DOJ Bulk Data Rule: Enforced by the Department of Justice, this rule places strict limitations and prohibitions on commercial transactions involving the cross-border transfer of bulk sensitive personal data or government-related data to countries of concern.
Stored Communications Act (SCA): Part of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), the SCA restricts certain companies from voluntarily revealing digital communications data to law enforcement.
Maybe we can convince Congress that Antifa is buying the location data collected by Flock cameras and cell phone towers to track ICE agents/cops. That might be what finally gets them to pass some sort of data privacy laws.
Re:
But that will only be for ICE.
Whoa whoa whoa. Kill? Where in the source material does it says this was ever actually used to kill US troops?